Blog

I want to build a web based chatbot with audio output & avatar, which is working 100% locally.

He should act like a sales assistant based on a set of rules (which I currently have in a pdf)

What software solutions would be the best? Fast performance, open source & relatively easy to „get him to learn what he should do“ are my goals.

Software I’ve researched, that comes to my mind:

Talking Avatar: Sadtalker TextToVoice: OpenVoice AI Chatbot itself: Mistral/Mixtral/GPT4All

Any thoughts on this? Which AI Chatbot do you think is the best?

If anyone needs a Cantina invite, please use mine. I still need 2 more people to use it so I can get on. https://cntn.ai/fbJnWSOUvFb

Regardless how you feel about the validity of the subject matter – I want to build a model that can give interpretations based on certain criteria and formulas. I’ve been using ChatGPT-4 with some success but it doesn’t have the memory recall needed to use instructions provided earlier in the chat session

​

What options are are available that don’t require coding? The knowledge base of ChatGPT-4 is good but its not consistent enough and requires frequent reminder prompts to produce the answers I’m seeking.

​

I’m a computer techncian and I’d like to know what’s the best AI chatbot to help me troubleshoot issues and learn new IT skills. I’m currently using Copilot as I think it’s using Chat GPT 4, which apparently is more up to date than the free chat.openai.com.

Any recommendations much appreciated.

Hello everyone!

I am full time physician and new to chatbot building technology. I’ve created a free chatbot to assist with colonoscopy and bowel prep, aiming to demystify the process and reduce patient stress. This tool is purely for enhancing my patient care, not for profit or sell.

Please give it a try and share your feedback via the “Help Us Improve” link to a Google Form. Your insights are crucial for improving the chatbot and understanding its impact on reducing patient anxiety.

Link for chatbot: ColonoscopyPrep Chatbot

Thank you for your support and feedback!

O WhatsApp se consolidou como o canal de comunicação preferido dos brasileiros, com mais de 120 milhões de usuários ativos. Para empresas que desejam aprimorar a experiência do cliente e impulsionar seus resultados, a implementação de um chatbot no WhatsApp se torna crucial.

Neste post, apresentaremos as melhores opções de chatbots para WhatsApp em 2024, com foco na ImChat, uma ferramenta inovadora que se destaca no mercado por sua eficiência, flexibilidade e custo-benefício.

1. Benefícios de um Chatbot para WhatsApp:

• Atendimento 24/7: Ofereça suporte instantâneo e eficiente aos seus clientes, mesmo fora do horário comercial.
• Agilidade e Automatização: Responda perguntas frequentes, agende compromissos, realize vendas e colete feedback de forma automática.
• Personalização: Crie fluxos de conversação personalizados que se adaptam às necessidades de seus clientes.
• Satisfação do Cliente: Melhore a experiência do cliente, oferecendo um atendimento rápido, eficiente e personalizado.
• Aumento da Produtividade: Libere sua equipe para tarefas mais estratégicas, automatizando tarefas repetitivas.
• Redução de Custos: Diminua os custos com atendimento ao cliente, automatizando tarefas que antes demandavam mão de obra humana.

2. O Que Buscar em um Chatbot para WhatsApp:

• Facilidade de Uso: A plataforma deve ser intuitiva e fácil de usar, tanto para a equipe de criação quanto para os clientes.
• Recursos Avançados: A plataforma deve oferecer recursos como criação de fluxos de conversação complexos, integração com outros sistemas e análise de dados.
• Suporte e Treinamento: A empresa deve oferecer suporte técnico de qualidade e treinamento para auxiliar na criação e gestão do chatbot.
• Segurança e Privacidade: A plataforma deve garantir a segurança dos dados dos clientes e estar em conformidade com as leis de proteção de dados.

3. ImChat: A Melhor Ferramenta do Mercado:

A ImChat se destaca como a melhor ferramenta de chatbot para WhatsApp em 2024, oferecendo uma série de vantagens que a tornam a escolha ideal para empresas de todos os portes:

• Facilidade de Uso: Interface intuitiva e amigável, com recursos de arrastar e soltar que facilitam a criação de fluxos de conversação.
• Recursos Avançados: Crie chatbots com inteligência artificial, integração com CRM, agendamento de consultas, pagamento online e muito mais.
• Suporte e Treinamento: Equipe de suporte altamente qualificada e treinamentos personalizados para auxiliar na criação e gestão do chatbot.
• Segurança e Privacidade: A plataforma garante a segurança dos dados dos clientes e está em conformidade com as leis de proteção de dados.
• Custo-Benefício: Preços acessíveis e planos flexíveis que se adaptam às necessidades de cada empresa.

4. Experimente a ImChat Gratuitamente:

A ImChat oferece um período de teste gratuito para que você possa experimentar todas as funcionalidades da plataforma e comprovar seus benefícios. Comece a criar seu chatbot para WhatsApp hoje mesmo e domine o atendimento ao cliente em 2024!

5. Recursos Adicionais:

• Blog da ImChat: Encontre dicas, tutoriais e cases de sucesso sobre chatbots para WhatsApp.
• E-book Gratuito: Aprenda tudo sobre como criar e implementar um chatbot para WhatsApp de forma eficaz.
• Webinars: Participe de webinars gratuitos sobre chatbots para WhatsApp e fique por dentro das últimas tendências do mercado.

A implementação de um chatbot para WhatsApp é uma excelente estratégia para empresas que desejam aprimorar o atendimento ao cliente, aumentar a produtividade e impulsionar seus resultados. A ImChat se destaca como a melhor ferramenta do mercado em 2024, oferecendo uma solução completa e eficaz para empresas de todos os portes.

https://imchat.com.br/

chatbot para WhatsApp, ImChat, atendimento ao cliente, automação, inteligência artificial, experiência do cliente, produtividade, vendas, marketing, SEO.

Appreciate your thoughts on this weirdass rabbit hole I fell into. (Warning: long post)

It’s is a no-brainer that the quality of a custom/preset character chatbot depends on how good they speak, yeah? You know: what they say; how they say it; how they respond to what you say; the works.

While I don’t dispute these standards, here’s the thing— those are all focused on what they say, yet I think attention should also be equally given to what they do.

Enter roleplay, the part that’s italicized or in parentheticals that signify non-verbal or narrative-style responses. It can be descriptive as (I suppress my mounting disappointment and plaster on the brightest smile I can get away with, my teeth gritting against each other despite my best efforts), or it can be short and sweet as (unzips pants).

There are times I’m more interested in how the bot uses roleplay to move around and progress a scenario. Does bot reply well, but it roleplays with very generic gestures or even uncharacteristic gestures (I’m looking at you preset Makima from Char AI that blushes waaay to easily)? Is the roleplay descriptive, but the bot’s response is nothing but roleplay? That kinda shit

​

So since I was bored, I whipped up a baseline custom character and scenario: Brother Marcus of the Imperial Fists chapter, fighting alongside Captain Iruel (as me) of the Blood Angels chapter against an advancing squad of Death Guard legionnaires. I’m in a 40k phase again right now since I’ve been getting back into Darktide recently, so yeah.

Anyway, I’ve plugged this character setting into the platforms I’ve been dicking around with these days: Character AI, Chai, and Haven Chat (new shit I found). I wanted to see how each handled the roleplay, especially in an action-heavy setting like 40k that has a lot shooty and stabby things going on. Here’s what I’ve found:

​

Character AI exchange can be found here. First thing is that it’s hard to read; the italicization doesn’t quite contrast enough with the standard font to separate roleplay from actual dialogue, especially in lengthier responses.

That being said, the roleplay fits well into the 40k stage as it draws focus on things like the astartes’ helmets and how the Death Guard are literally rotting. It also uses language and turns of phrase like “fury”, hatred”, and “by/for the Emperor” which are common 40k parlance. The AI model clearly has been fed 40k training data.

I have nitpicks with the mechanics, as it were, of certain actions depicted: like when Brother Marcus uses the butt-end of his bolter to smash in a Death Guard’s visor, which is fine, but then he apparently unleashes a flurry of blows that then shatter the same Death Guard’s pauldrons and arms— presumably with the same bolter, which paints an odd picture to say the least.

Overall though, I like how the roleplaying was able to give it the specific 40k thematic, but I just wish it were easier on the eyes to read.

​

CHAI exchange can be found here (more caps since I had to use my phone with a smaller screen). Same with Char AI that it’s hard to read; the italics just aren’t enough, especially if there aren’t any punctuations in between italicized roleplaying text and standard font dialogue text.

While not as extensive as Character AI, there are still evident 40k-specific elements incorporated the roleplay, such as voice (vox) modulator, the influence of the warp taken as pollution to an Imperial Fist, and Brother Marcus drawing, specifically, a chainsword.

My gripe is that, every now and again, responses are dominated by if not completely roleplay text. I’d really want a better balance between action and dialogue. Pure roleplay might be “realistic” in this action sequence, but it’s still a chat at the end of the day, so imo I’d still want some actual banter even at the expense of realism.

Overall, it has some very descriptive roleplay but sometimes to the detriment of any dialogue.

​

Haven Chat exchange can be found here. Stylistics first: it takes getting used to, coming from Character AI and CHAI, but using parentheses for roleplay is better on my eyes. While not related to roleplay, it has to be said— there is something fucky going on with the frequent misspellings, names especially, which adversely affects immersion in its own way with how often it occurs.

For the roleplay itself, it can be quite creative. It’s only with this chatbot that had Brother Marcus suddenly roleplaying psyker things so that I myself had to improvise. The bot was also smart enough to roleplay throwing a grenade into the demon’s mouth as a response my previous input to being grabbed by it and just screaming “Your grenades!”

Evidently, the roleplay has less 40k thematic spins on it (prolly means less specific training data) compared to Character AI and CHAI. What I will say though is that it strikes a good balance between roleplaying and dialogue. Admittedly for this case, I enjoyed the dialogue more than I did the roleplay.

Overall, good dialogue with serviceable roleplay. If only the misspellings get sorted out.

​

So there we go. This isn’t really the part where I try to crown a winner; was just interested to see how differently things played out per chatbot given as similar a character setting/background as possible with particular attention to roleplay. Character AI had very thematic 40k roleplay but can sometimes stumble on the logistics/details of it. CHAI also has the same thematic roleplay capabilities but tends to sacrifice actual dialogue. Haven doesn’t have that same thematic polish but has more spontaneity to its roleplay with a good balance with dialogue.

Needless to say, it was a fun way to kill time. You guys got any similar sentiments or experiences on chatbot roleplay? (I also like reading through screencaps)