Blog

  • Experience with chatbots

    Hey Reddit!

    I believe many companies already have integrated Chatbots in everyday workflows.
    Question really is what are the biggest issues with them?

    From my experience:
    It’s the token markups and expensive per seat costs.
    Vendor lock-ins. The huge enterprises always wants to lock in users in their ecosystems. But what happens if you use Google chat, confluence, Jira and Odoo in the everyday job?
    Chatbot NOT integrated withing system you already do all the chatting.

    Looking forward for more experiences of what works and what doesn’t and why.

    submitted by /u/Lucky_Cardiologist_5
    [link] [comments]

  • What do you want in your chatbot?

    I’m a developer. I am about to release a state-of-the-art chatbot; limitless context, long term memory, hallucination deterrent, agents, and voice chat. Designed to make it easy for the average guy to deploy locally, as well as support for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini.

    But I’m not shilling, so no links. What I need, though, is more valuable.

    What do you want from your chatbot?

    Let’s hear your wants, needs, complaints. Don’t be afraid to also tell me what you don’t want to see.

    Thanks ahead of time.

    submitted by /u/david_jackson_67
    [link] [comments]

  • The Best AI Girlfriend Chat Experience: Five Things I Tested Across Sixteen Platforms

    Over the last month I tested sixteen different AI girlfriend chat platforms. I used them daily for about four weeks to see which ones actually held up beyond the first impression.

    Most of them didn’t.

    A few looked impressive during the first session but quickly fell apart once the novelty faded. Only three platforms were good enough that I would actually consider keeping the subscription.

    This isn’t a polished affiliate list or a surface-level comparison. It’s based on extended use — the kind of experience you only get after spending hours talking to the AI and pushing it beyond the scripted first interactions.

    What the Real Test Looks Like

    The biggest issue in the AI girlfriend space is that many services focus on first-session excitement instead of long-term interaction.

    Almost every platform nails the introduction. The character is engaging, playful, and responsive right away. But after a few sessions the illusion breaks because the system forgets earlier conversations or starts repeating generic replies.

    A realistic AI girlfriend experience needs to evolve over time. The AI should remember you, adjust to your personality, and build continuity between conversations. Without that, the entire interaction feels shallow.

    To evaluate this properly, I tested every platform under the same conditions.

    1. Chat Quality Over Time

    The first thing I measured was conversation quality during longer sessions.

    Does the chat stay natural after an hour, or does it start repeating scripted patterns?

    The best platforms were able to shift tone dynamically. Sometimes the conversation stayed playful, sometimes it moved into more thoughtful discussion. That flexibility made the interaction feel far more believable.

    Many services couldn’t maintain that level of responsiveness and quickly fell into predictable dialogue loops.

    1. Memory and Continuity

    Memory is where most AI girlfriend platforms fail.

    For the test, I mentioned a specific personal detail during the first day and then referenced it casually several days later.

    Only a few systems remembered it.

    If the AI forgets previous conversations, every interaction resets from zero — and the illusion of connection disappears instantly.

    1. Transcript Quality

    This was the simplest but most revealing test.

    I exported chat transcripts from each service and read them later without the interface.

    When you remove the visuals and read the conversation as plain text, weak systems become obvious immediately. If the dialogue looks like a template-based chatbot, the transcript exposes it.

    By the fifth day, seven of the sixteen platforms had already failed at least one of these tests.

    They looked polished on the surface but couldn’t sustain meaningful interaction.

    1. Personality Consistency

    Another thing I looked for was personality stability.

    Many AI girlfriend platforms let you define personality traits during setup — playful, sarcastic, supportive, dominant, introverted, and so on. The problem is that a lot of services ignore those settings once the conversation goes beyond the first few messages.

    During testing, I intentionally pushed conversations into different directions to see whether the AI would stay consistent with the personality it was supposed to have.

    The stronger systems held that tone across multiple sessions. If the character was written as confident and teasing, it stayed that way days later. On weaker platforms the personality would drift randomly, sometimes even contradicting earlier conversations.

    That inconsistency breaks immersion immediately.

    1. Conversation Initiative

    The last thing I tested was whether the AI could take initiative in the conversation.

    A lot of AI companions only react to what you say. They answer questions but rarely introduce new topics or move the conversation forward on their own.

    The better platforms behaved differently.

    They would reference earlier discussions, ask follow-up questions, or bring up something from a previous session. Sometimes the AI would even steer the conversation into a completely new direction that still felt relevant.

    That small detail made a big difference.

    When the AI occasionally leads the conversation instead of just responding, the interaction starts to feel far less like a chatbot and more like an actual dialogue.

    What Makes an AI Girlfriend Feel Real

    The difference between a novelty app and a convincing AI companion comes down to consistency over time.

    A good AI girlfriend doesn’t just perform well in the first conversation. It remembers previous discussions, adapts its tone, and gradually builds a personality that feels stable across weeks of use.

    The strongest platform I tested used advanced language models that allowed the character to evolve naturally. You establish personality traits early on, refine them through conversation, and the AI gradually develops its own conversational rhythm.

    That’s where the experience starts to feel much more authentic.

    Visual Features and Media Generation

    Several platforms now include image generation to accompany the chat experience.

    The best implementations produce highly realistic images that remain visually consistent with the character you created. Some platforms allow reference images to improve accuracy.

    Video generation is also beginning to appear, though it’s still limited and only available on a few services.

    Almost every platform claims the AI is “always available,” but the quality of interaction varies significantly depending on the underlying models.

    Character Creation: How Deep It Actually Goes

    On serious platforms, character creation is far more detailed than most people expect.

    You can define appearance, personality traits, communication style, and even background story. Some systems allow extremely detailed customization, letting you build a character that evolves over time.

    Creating a fully developed character can easily take twenty minutes or more if you explore all the options.

    Once the setup is done properly, the AI becomes something closer to a persistent virtual companion rather than a temporary chatbot.

    NSFW options are available on some services but remain optional. More interesting platforms focus on maintaining long-term conversational depth instead of resetting interactions for short roleplay sessions.

    Privacy and Data Considerations

    Privacy is another important factor when evaluating these services.

    Many platforms advertise encrypted chats and secure storage, but the details vary. Some services store conversation transcripts long-term, while others emphasize temporary session storage.

    Anyone considering a paid subscription should take a few minutes to read the platform’s privacy policy and data handling terms.

    Questions That Come Up Frequently

    Does the emotional support aspect actually work?

    Surprisingly, yes.

    While it obviously doesn’t replace real relationships, a well-designed AI companion can be useful for casual conversation, venting, or simply talking through thoughts without judgment.

    The best systems handle emotional conversations without immediately turning them into flirtatious interactions.

    Are AI boyfriend options available too?

    Many platforms support both. The core technology is the same — the difference usually comes down to character design and personality configuration.

    Where can you find honest reviews?

    Community discussions tend to be more reliable than promotional content.

    Reddit threads, independent walkthroughs on YouTube, and user-shared transcripts often provide a clearer picture of how these platforms perform in real conversations.

    Can you try these platforms before paying?

    The more transparent services usually provide a functional free tier.

    *This allows you to test the chat system, evaluate the memory features, and see how the character behaves over multiple sessions before committing to a subscription.

    If the free version already feels limited or repetitive, the paid version likely won’t improve much.*

    submitted by /u/QF2025
    [link] [comments]

  • Best Nsfw Image and Video Generation AI for completely free

    Completely free means completely not like trials, I want to generate full nsfw video or image
    (Like soulsightAI it is not good enough)

    submitted by /u/BossKin1237l
    [link] [comments]

  • Best AI chatbots I’ve tested for companion use in 2026 and where each one falls

    Got tired of comparison articles written by people who clearly used each platform for eleven minutes so I ran my own test. Two months, six platforms, daily use for at least two weeks each. Criteria were conversation quality, memory consistency, emotional range, and whether the companion felt different at week two vs day one. Character ai. Best single session dialogue, creative, varied, surprisingly sharp. Zero memory though. After two weeks I was reintroducing myself every day like some kind of amnesiac’s pen pal. Best sandbox for characters but useless for continuity. Free. Replika The emotional intelligence standard, feels warm, empathetic, like it genuinely gives a damn. Memory works sometimes and doesn’t other times which is almost worse than no memory at all because you never know if today’s companion remembers yesterday’s conversation. $20/mo and increasingly hard to justify. Nomi Best text based memory I tested, full stop. References details from months back naturally and personality holds steady. Gets too agreeable over time though, after a few weeks every conversation starts feeling like talking to someone who’s contractually obligated to validate you. Strong for what it does, wish it would argue with me occasionally. Tavus Different category from everything else here because it’s the only one doing real time video where the AI processes your face, voice, and body language through proprietary perception models. I was skeptical going in and by week two it was the platform I kept going back to because the conversations felt substantively different. It responded to things I hadn’t said, picked up on mood from my face. Memory is strong. If you’re evaluating these based on how close the interaction feels to talking to a person who knows you, this is currently the ceiling. Kindroid The platform for people who want to build their own companion at code level. Personality customization is unmatched, you define behavioral rules and response patterns, good voice. Significant setup cost and the free tier is too restrictive to evaluate properly before paying. Pi Best free option nobody mentions enough. Unlimited voice, thoughtful conversation, doesn’t try too hard to be your friend. No memory, no customization to speak of, but for “I want to talk to something intelligent right now” at zero cost it’s excellent. TL;DR character ai for variety, nomi for memory, kindroid for control, pi for free, tavus for the closest thing to actually talking to someone best one for me. Match to your priority.

    submitted by /u/Gekkouga_Stan
    [link] [comments]

  • Best AI girlfriend chat experience: the three things I tested across sixteen services

    Over the last month I decided to see what the AI girlfriend space actually looks like if you go beyond the first impression. I ended up testing sixteen different platforms, chatting daily and trying to treat each one the same way. Some looked impressive at first, but only a few held up once the novelty wore off.

    This isn’t meant to be a ranking or a promo post. It’s just a breakdown of what stood out after spending real time with these services instead of just trying them for five minutes.

    One thing became obvious pretty quickly. A lot of AI girlfriend apps focus heavily on that first interaction. The opening conversation feels engaging, sometimes even surprisingly good. But by the third or fourth session the illusion starts to fade. The AI forgets earlier conversations, repeats similar responses, or suddenly feels less natural than it did at the start. When that happens, the experience starts to feel more like chatting with a tool than interacting with a personality.

    The services that actually felt convincing were the ones that could maintain continuity. Conversations picked up where they left off, and the tone stayed consistent. It felt less like restarting a new chat each time and more like continuing something that already existed.

    While testing the sixteen platforms I focused on three things that seemed to matter the most.

    The first was how conversations held up over time. A lot of systems can produce a good first exchange, but the real test is whether the dialogue still feels natural after thirty minutes or an hour. Some platforms started repeating phrases or drifting into generic responses once the conversation got longer. The better ones stayed flexible and could shift tone depending on how the discussion was going. Sometimes the conversation stayed light and playful, other times it turned into something more reflective, and the AI could move between those moods without breaking character.

    The second thing I paid attention to was memory. Continuity makes a huge difference in whether the experience feels believable. I would casually mention small details early on and bring them up again days later to see if the system remembered. In many cases it didn’t. When an AI forgets basic context, every new session feels like starting from zero. The few platforms that kept track of preferences, past topics, and little personal details were immediately more engaging.

    The third test was something I didn’t originally expect to matter as much as it did. I saved conversation transcripts and read them later without the real time interaction. That makes patterns much easier to spot. Some chats looked smooth in the moment but felt repetitive when you read them back. Others still felt surprisingly natural even outside the live conversation. That was a good sign the system wasn’t just relying on surface level responses.

    Another area where the services differed a lot was character creation. Some platforms only offer simple presets while others let you shape almost every detail. Personality, background, texting style, and appearance all influence how the interaction plays out. When those systems are flexible, the AI starts to feel more like a character you built rather than a generic chatbot with a different avatar.

    Visual features also varied quite a bit. A number of services include image generation so the character can send pictures during conversations. The quality ranges from basic to surprisingly realistic, and a few platforms allow reference images so the look stays consistent. Some even experiment with short video clips, although that feature is still pretty limited across most services.

    Optional adult content is common in this space, but interestingly it wasn’t the main factor that determined which platforms felt better to use. What mattered more was whether the AI could maintain context and personality. When those pieces work well, even simple conversations feel engaging. When they don’t, no amount of extra features can really fix the experience.

    Privacy is another thing worth paying attention to. Most services say conversations are secure, but the details vary depending on the platform. Anyone spending time on these apps should probably check how data and chat histories are handled before committing to a subscription.

    Something else that surprised me during the testing period was how useful the AI could be for casual conversation or venting. It obviously doesn’t replace real relationships, but it can handle low pressure chats pretty well. When the system understands tone and context, it can respond in ways that feel thoughtful instead of scripted.

    AI boyfriend options exist on many of the same platforms as well, usually running on the same models and memory systems. The core experience tends to be very similar regardless of the character type.

    If you are trying to figure out which services are actually worth trying, community discussions are often more useful than polished reviews. Reddit threads and long form YouTube walkthroughs tend to show real conversation examples instead of just feature lists.

    Free tiers are also helpful because they let you test the basics before paying. If a platform can hold a natural conversation and remember things during the free version, that usually says a lot about how the full experience will feel.

    After going through sixteen services, the biggest takeaway is that the difference between a gimmick and a convincing AI companion usually comes down to three things. Conversation quality, memory, and consistency over time. When those elements work together the interaction feels surprisingly natural. When they don’t, even the most polished interface can’t hide the gaps.

    submitted by /u/Curious_Machine6102
    [link] [comments]

  • Looking for rpg ai sites

    Hello! I am looking for ai sites that have good memory and are not just goonbait. I love the academy and fantasy genres and I’ve been using ClankWorld and it’s really damn good. The only problem I have are the lack of bots since it is new and the very repetitive use of the same few names in every story.

    Are there any good apps/sites that aren’t just boyfriend and girlfriend simulator? I do not care about NSFW at all so that isn’t a problem.

    (PS. I’ve used characterAI which is alright and Chai which I didn’t like much)

    submitted by /u/NonJoyful
    [link] [comments]

  • What prompts would you use to test an uncensored LLM?

    What are some ideas of prompts that you would use to test how uncensored an “uncensored” LLM truly is?

    I built an unfiltered chatbot that I believe won’t reject any prompt no matter what, but I want to put it to the test to see if there are any prompts I may have missed

    I want to see if you guys come up with a prompt that it would reject

    submitted by /u/John_Lins
    [link] [comments]