Even to morbid questions? I’m not talking about self-harm of course but I would like a chatbot that answers to everything without censorship.

I recently ran a small experiment while building an AI companion called Beni (Was in beta and results are from our Tester and Early Users who agreed to provide feeback,

I was curious about something: do people open up more to AI than to real humans?

So I asked a few early users to try two things for a week:

• Talk to a friend about something personal
• Talk to the AI about the same topic

What surprised me wasn’t that people talked to the AI , it was how quickly they opened up.

A few patterns I noticed:

• People shared personal problems faster with AI
• Conversations lasted longer than typical chatbot interactions
• Many users said they felt “less judged” talking to AI
• Late-night conversations were the longest ones

It made me wonder if AI companions might become something like a thinking space rather than just a chatbot.

Curious what others think:

Do you find it easier to talk openly with AI than with real people?

ATTENTION chatbot users: I am conducting research as a part of the criteria to complete a Doctor of Education degree at Liberty University. The purpose of my research is to better understand the use of AI chatbots to deal with loneliness. To participate, you must be age 18-24, felt lonely in the past 6 months, interacted at least 5 days a week with a chatbot during that 6 month period, and live in the United States. Participants will be asked to take part in a one-on-one, audio- and video- recorded interview over Zoom, which should take about 15-30 minutes to complete. If you are interested and eligible to participate, please direct message me or email the address at the end of this post. Consent information will be provided via email at the time of the interview. [jkhinklestanley@liberty.edu](mailto:jkhinklestanley@liberty.edu)

I wrote a breakdown of OpenAI’s new Record & Replay feature for Codex, and it made me think about where chatbot tools are heading.

The core idea: instead of explaining the same workflow every time, you show Codex the process once. Codex can then turn that recording into an editable skill that can be reused later.

That is interesting because a lot of chatbot use today still depends on giving instructions over and over. Record & Replay points toward a different pattern: show the task, save the steps, review the skill, then reuse it when needed.

A few things stood out to me:

• It works best for repeatable tasks with clear steps.
• The generated skill can be inspected and edited, which is important.
• This could apply to workflows like expense reports, issue creation, time-off requests, recurring reports, or file uploads.
• Privacy is a major concern since the system can observe what is happening on screen.
• Human review still matters before trusting the result.

My main takeaway is that this is not just about chat. It is about chat-based tools becoming more capable of carrying out structured work, while still needing clear boundaries and review.

I wrote more here: https://aigptjournal.com/news-ai/record-replay-codex/

Do you think chatbot tools should move further into workflow execution?

I love this feature but it’s not free and even if I pay vip do I get to use reading mind unlimited? If not is there any app that has this feature? Please free unlimited

So I had created rag bot integrated with meta messaging api. And did some market research and found there must be a mechanism where when admin replies to customer then the response from the llm is to be blocked in order to prevent double talk (.I.e: llm, admin) .

I tried to get event message_handover , message_postback from meta in order to trigger my stopping mechanism but for some reason despite showing my page is subscribed to the events ,it is not getting event signal of message_postback when admin takes over.

If you had similar issue help me with some suggestion.

.

Is there a unfiltered ai assistants similar to gemini that are free that are unlimited messages?

Hi everyone,

I’m building a Telegram bot using Botpress Cloud (modern Flow Builder) and I’m facing a strange issue with Choice Cards.

Until recently, my Choice Cards were displayed correctly as inline keyboard buttons (under the bot message).

However, now—without changing anything in my flow—the same Choice Cards are being displayed as a reply keyboard, meaning the buttons appear above the text input field instead of under the message.

This breaks the UX of my funnel since it makes the options feel like user input suggestions instead of structured button actions.

Is there a setting in Botpress Cloud that controls whether Choice Cards use Inline Keyboard vs Reply Keyboard on Telegram?

Or did something change recently in how Telegram channels handle Choice Cards?

Any help or clarification would be really appreciated 🙏