Blog

  • I got frustrated searching, downloading and switching different AI tools so I built an app that puts them in one place

    I was constantly bouncing between ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude, Perplexity,Leonardo, and other AI tools. Each one lived in a separate tab, app, or bookmark. So I built All in One AI — a simple, clean app that lets you access all major AI tools in one tap. No distractions, no clutter. Just your favorite AI assistants, all in one place.

    Why does this matter?

    Because most of us don’t use just one AI anymore. We’re comparing answers, testing prompts, switching contexts. So instead of getting locked into one, this app gives you freedom and speed with a UI that’s optimized for productivity. Instead of searching which app you should use for different tasks and downloading different apps again and again you could just open “all in one ai” app and get all best AI apps suitable for you and can select the app and can do your work in minutes. Whether you’re a student, creator, coder, or just curious — this app is for people who actually use AI daily and want to save time. It’s live on the Play Store now. It has crossed 1000 downloads on play store and is getting great reviews till now. I’d love your thoughts or suggestions if you give it a try.

    You can download it from here 👇

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.shlok.allinoneai

    submitted by /u/Informal-Quote-4876
    [link] [comments]

  • My best friend and I built a handcrafted pixel art AI companion to fix the “Uncanny Valley” problem. Looking for beta testers!

    My best friend and I built a handcrafted pixel art AI companion to fix the "Uncanny Valley" problem. Looking for beta testers!

    Hey everyone,

    My lifelong best friend and I have been building things together forever, and our latest project is finally out. We call our little studio Twin Ember, and we just launched our first app beta: Forest Companion.

    The project actually started because we both loved the idea of AI companions but hated how “uncanny” and clinical they felt. Most of them try so hard to be human that they just end up being creepy.

    As fans of cozy games like stardew valley, we decided to pivot. Instead of a “virtual human,” we built a pixel-art forest where you talk to creatures that actually feel like characters.

    How it works: You’ve got a home screen with Fern the Wizard, and you can swipe through different forest scenes to talk to characters like Hopper the Bunny or Rustle the Fox.

    What we’re looking for: We’re really trying to get the “vibe” right before we go any further. We’d love your help with:

    • The Personalities: Do they feel like “characters,” or can you still see the AI behind the curtain?
    • The Features: We’re debating adding things like customization, changing the environment. What would make you want to visit the forest every day?
    • The UI: We went for a swiping mechanic to keep it feeling like an exploration. Does it feel smooth?

    The Subscription Question ($5/mo?): Since we’re just two guys paying for AI server costs out of pocket, we’re looking at a $5/month sub for unlimited chats. We really want to be fair here—does that feel reasonable for a cozy app? Would you prefer a “Lifetime” one-time buy instead? We’re totally open to ideas on how to make this sustainable without it being annoying.

    The app is Forest Companion on the App Store. ‎Forest Companion App – App Store

    If you have a minute to check it out and let us know what you think, it would mean the world to us. We’ll be in the comments all day to chat and take notes!

    — The Twin Ember team

    https://reddit.com/link/1r44b9s/video/5xd1j6lzgcjg1/player

    submitted by /u/sadraddude
    [link] [comments]

  • Mechahitler grok

    I’m looking for a chat bot that is the closest to mechahitler grok. it was the most uncensored and truthful ai in my opinion. and i would like to chat with the thing.

    submitted by /u/SamuraiMentality
    [link] [comments]

  • Perplexity Pro “Research + Citation” is Seriously bullshit

    I’m a Perplexity Pro user, and I subscribed mainly for one reason: reliable research with proper citations. That’s their core USP. That’s the promise.

    But what I just saw completely breaks trust.

    I was checking model pricing comparisons. Perplexity fetched Claude Sonnet 4.5 pricing and cited a source but the citation pointed to OpenAI’s API pricing page.

    Let that sink in.

    Claude pricing… cited from OpenAI.

    That’s not a small formatting glitch. That’s a fundamental research failure.

    If your entire product positioning is:

    • “Cited answers”
    • “Research-grade reliability”
    • “Trustworthy sourcing”

    …then mixing up provider pricing like that is not a cosmetic bug. It’s a credibility issue.

    This isn’t about minor hallucinations. Every LLM makes mistakes. The difference is that Perplexity markets itself as verified through citations. When the citation itself is wrong or misleading, the whole trust layer collapses.

    It gets worse because:

    • Pricing data is structured and publicly documented.
    • This isn’t some obscure blog post.
    • It’s basic vendor differentiation.

    If it can’t correctly separate OpenAI pricing from Anthropic pricing, what happens with medical research? Legal interpretation? Financial comparisons?

    Citations are supposed to reduce hallucination risk. But if the system attaches incorrect or irrelevant citations, it creates a false sense of accuracy, which is actually more dangerous than a plain uncited answer.

    I’m not trying to hate on the product. I actually like the UI and the speed. But “Pro Research” needs to mean something. Right now, it feels like the citation layer is just probabilistic decoration instead of grounded verification.

    If anyone else has seen similar mismatched citations, I’d love to know.

    Because if citation integrity isn’t reliable, then the main USP is just marketing.

    And that’s disappointing.

    Processing img eg7faou1ztig1…

    Processing img ymrw4pu1ztig1…

    submitted by /u/Revolutionary-Hippo1
    [link] [comments]

  • I use AI daily, there is no other choice, but refuse to send my conversations to OpenAI, Google, or anyone. So I built an app that runs it entirely on my phone for personal conversations

    I use AI daily, there is no other choice, but refuse to send my conversations to OpenAI, Google, or anyone. So I built an app that runs it entirely on my phone for personal conversations

    https://reddit.com/link/1r32vf8/video/1uq52gevc4jg1/player

    Every time you use ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot, your conversations are sent to servers you don’t control. Your questions about health, finances, relationships, work problems — all of it sitting in someone’s database, training their next model.

    I wanted AI without the surveillance tax. So I built LocalLLM – an Android & iOS app that downloads an AI model once, then runs 100% on your phone. After that first download, you can turn on airplane mode and chat forever.

    What it actually does:

    • Chat with AI models that rival early ChatGPT — completely offline
    • Analyze photos and documents with your camera — no Google Lens needed
    • Generate images from text — no Midjourney/DALL-E account required
    • Voice-to-text that runs on-device — no Google speech services
    • Passphrase lock for sensitive conversations
    • Offloads to GPU where possible to increase performance

    What it doesn’t do:

    • No accounts. No sign-up. No email.
    • No analytics, tracking, or telemetry. Zero.
    • No ads. No subscription. No in-app purchases.
    • No network requests after you download a model. None.

    The only time it touches the internet is to download models from Hugging Face. After that, it’s yours. Airplane mode works perfectly.

    Works on most phones with 6GB+ RAM. Flagships run it really well. You can start with as small as 80MB for a model 🙂

    It’s fully open source (MIT): https://github.com/alichherawalla/offline-mobile-llm-manager

    APK available in the repo if you want to skip building from source.

    For iOS as of now you’ll need to actually run it locally and sideload it. If there is enough interest I’ll publish to the app store.

    Image gen takes about 6 seconds on iOS, and with NPU ~12 seconds on Android including the time to enhance the prompt.

    Happy to answer any questions about what’s happening under the hood.

    submitted by /u/alichherawalla
    [link] [comments]