Author: Franz Malten Buemann

I was constantly bouncing between ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude, Perplexity,Leonardo, and other AI tools. Each one lived in a separate tab, app, or bookmark. So I built All in One AI — a simple, clean app that lets you access all major AI tools in one tap. No distractions, no clutter. Just your favorite AI assistants, all in one place.

Why does this matter?

Because most of us don’t use just one AI anymore. We’re comparing answers, testing prompts, switching contexts. So instead of getting locked into one, this app gives you freedom and speed with a UI that’s optimized for productivity. Instead of searching which app you should use for different tasks and downloading different apps again and again you could just open “all in one ai” app and get all best AI apps suitable for you and can select the app and can do your work in minutes. Whether you’re a student, creator, coder, or just curious — this app is for people who actually use AI daily and want to save time. It’s live on the Play Store now. It has crossed 1000 downloads on play store and is getting great reviews till now. I’d love your thoughts or suggestions if you give it a try.

You can download it from here 👇

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.shlok.allinoneai

I’m looking for a chat bot that is the closest to mechahitler grok. it was the most uncensored and truthful ai in my opinion. and i would like to chat with the thing.

I’m a Perplexity Pro user, and I subscribed mainly for one reason: reliable research with proper citations. That’s their core USP. That’s the promise.

But what I just saw completely breaks trust.

I was checking model pricing comparisons. Perplexity fetched Claude Sonnet 4.5 pricing and cited a source but the citation pointed to OpenAI’s API pricing page.

Let that sink in.

Claude pricing… cited from OpenAI.

That’s not a small formatting glitch. That’s a fundamental research failure.

If your entire product positioning is:

• “Cited answers”
• “Research-grade reliability”
• “Trustworthy sourcing”

…then mixing up provider pricing like that is not a cosmetic bug. It’s a credibility issue.

This isn’t about minor hallucinations. Every LLM makes mistakes. The difference is that Perplexity markets itself as verified through citations. When the citation itself is wrong or misleading, the whole trust layer collapses.

It gets worse because:

• Pricing data is structured and publicly documented.
• This isn’t some obscure blog post.
• It’s basic vendor differentiation.

If it can’t correctly separate OpenAI pricing from Anthropic pricing, what happens with medical research? Legal interpretation? Financial comparisons?

Citations are supposed to reduce hallucination risk. But if the system attaches incorrect or irrelevant citations, it creates a false sense of accuracy, which is actually more dangerous than a plain uncited answer.

I’m not trying to hate on the product. I actually like the UI and the speed. But “Pro Research” needs to mean something. Right now, it feels like the citation layer is just probabilistic decoration instead of grounded verification.

If anyone else has seen similar mismatched citations, I’d love to know.

Because if citation integrity isn’t reliable, then the main USP is just marketing.

And that’s disappointing.

Processing img eg7faou1ztig1…

Processing img ymrw4pu1ztig1…