Can someone explain to me how the creators of all the chatBots have concluded that the training material they CHOSE to use … is factually correct … so completely error-free that they do not need to have any system for correcting the ‘truths’ that they have taught the bots.
I am not interested in personally receiving the particular correct facts … I already know them. I am interested in Jo Public receiving the true facts when he asks the bots. The powers-that-be must be loving this protection from criticism, from looking foolish (and immoral), from facing legal liability for teaching/testing/accrediting new members of their profession.
All the chatBots give wrong facts even though the provably correct information has been public for more than a decade. Leaving a comment behind a ‘thumbs down’ icon does nothing.
Are there other issues you know about where the training materials used were wrong?
submitted by /u/Patient_Implement897
[link] [comments]